Tuesday, May 28, 2019

Trade Commission :: essays research papers

The Federal Trade Commission, in submitting a Request For Public gab Concerning Guides For The Dog And Cat Food Industry, is asking the American Public to rate guidelines for monitoring the pet food industry that have been in place since 1969. Since the base thrust of the original guidelines was to control misrepresentation in the industry, it is hard to imagine that the public would disagree with the original intent of the guidelines. It would also be prudent to assess whether a review of such sound guidelines would be either necessary or worth the cost of carrying out the assessment. On the other hand, it has been thirty old age since the original guidelines were implemented, giving the public and the industry time to see if the guidelines have done their job in a cost-effective manner and whether or non they need to be retooled for an industry that has gone through considerable technological and economic changes. Therefore, it would seem reasonable to conduct a survey that would target get a line areas, such as any overlapping of the guidelines with federal, state, and local anesthetic laws, the integrity of industry self-regulation in a new era of economic and technological advances, and whether or not the guidelines have imposed undue cost to both the industry and the public.Few would argue with the points of the original guidelines, whether it is monitoring misleading claims in advertising, or monitoring the lineament of the products themselves. Despite economic and technological advances that have taken place in the industry since 1969, the guidelines still hold up as sound. There are also federal, state, and local laws that attempt to insure the same integrity in the pet food industry. The pet food industry also closely monitors itself. Given in all these factors, it would seem best to question the necessity of such a survey, or, at least, to limit its scope and cost.What could be unseen motives for initiating such a reassessment? The American pet food industry would certainly want to keep pressure on the government to regulate foreign competition, insisting that competitors meet the same stringent standards set for American manufacturers. The FTC would also stand to gain from the number of its workers that would be paid for conducting the reassessment and the power and prestige that such guidelines tend to give the FTCIt world power be useful to assess how much cost the original guidelines have imposed on the industry and the consumer in increased prices for pet foods and if the guidelines have added anything to federal, state, and local laws that already monitor the industry.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.